Re: [mepbmlist] middle earth question (finally) becomes g58 taunt

[John Stagoll]

>> with the MEPBM game and Tolkien in general. Am I
>> wrong? Is this list for
>> political bashing?

not political but certainly for game bashing!

Like WC game 58, death to you DS! your number is up! The Sindar will
rule all! Half of Harad for starters will do nicely.

For interest and following a thread on the deft message board, game 34
WC (58 is the turnaround) was won by the DS on a freep resignation
turn 25 or so, I can't say we noticed anything quirky with the agent
actions in that game, its all about picking your targets afterall. And
if the comm is too scary, curse him!

[Din]

--- John Stagoll <john.stagoll@...>
wrote: > >> with the MEPBM game and Tolkien in
general. Am
> I
> >> wrong? Is this list for
> >> political bashing?
>
> not political but certainly for game bashing!
>
> Like WC game 58, death to you DS! your number is up!
> The Sindar will
> rule all! Half of Harad for starters will do nicely.

I wouldn't complain that much. Your opposition seems
to have downhill ever since they added aussies to
their side. Not that i'm knocking marcus, but another
aussie that might or might not have taken a standby
position in that game isn't very good (or so I think).

:)

Its amazing how much a difference there is between a
good team of 12 players and a group of 12 players.

if i was playing DS, i would be crying by now (and its
only turn 5)

:(


>
> For interest and following a thread on the deft
> message board, game 34
> WC (58 is the turnaround)

which one was that ? all the threads seem to be
replies to old stuff.

was won by the DS on a
> freep resignation
> turn 25 or so, I can't say we noticed anything
> quirky with the agent
> actions in that game, its all about picking your
> targets afterall.

I think the changes to agents went in after we
started, but i agree that we didn't notice. But at
that stage our agents were pretty good. I think they
said it doesn't affect the super agents.

A good message was the one who said that its the free
who get hammered by the changes. They argued that
since the free develop super agents after the ds, they
will fall even more behind in getting agents good
enough to kill people.


thanks
din

[John Stagoll]

>which one was that ? all the threads seem to be
>replies to old stuff.

somethings never change :-)

>I think the changes to agents went in after we
>started, but i agree that we didn't notice. But at
>that stage our agents were pretty good. I think they
>said it doesn't affect the super agents.

no, the original complaint was that even the uberagents were failing
which really makes me wonder. There are plenty of reasons why your
agent may fail afterall.

>A good message was the one who said that its the free
>who get hammered by the changes. They argued that
>since the free develop super agents after the ds, they
>will fall even more behind in getting agents good
>enough to kill people.

freep developing agents? heh heh no wonder they lose....