blchezluis
2nd February 2008, 12:02 PM
--- In mepbmlist@y..., "blchezluis" <blchezluis@a...> wrote:
> --- In mepbmlist@y..., Jason Bennett <jasonab@a...> wrote:
> > marc_pinsonneault wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not in this one, but it does bring back some memories.
> > > How often is it possible for the free to win when both the Duns
> and
> > > Rhuduar go dark right out of the opening gate? This happened in
> > > 1650/310 and it was over within a very short time. It is one
> thing
> > > for neutrals to decide to join an obviously superior team, but
> quite
> > > another to have turn 1 declarations effectively decide the
> outcome.
> >
> > The neutrals didn't switch on turn 1, but it was fairly early
(turn
> > 3-4). We southern neutrals (I was Harad) dickered around for
> another few
> > turns while AR & CA were overrun. There was a lot (LOT!) of
wailing
> and
> > gnashing of teeth on both sides to try and woo HA and CO. In the
> end, we
> > both went FP, although to no avail. Had we gone FP earlier,
things
> would
> > probably have been much different.
> >
> > jason
>
> No it would not have, you are not that good of a player. The DS
saw
> at most 3000 Harad troops the entire game, how lame.
>
> Brian
And add to the fact you had stated you were going to go DS, and then
backed out because you didn't want to tangle with the Corsairs. Give
me a break, RH and Dunn together do not equal a turn 8 Corsair,
Harad, and Easterling. The DS just outplayed you all. Congrats to
those who were willing to still spend money on the game.
Brian
PS No hard feelings to the Corsairs or Easterlings who had never made
such claims of going DS.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jason Bennett, jasonab@a...
> > E pur si muove!
> --- In mepbmlist@y..., Jason Bennett <jasonab@a...> wrote:
> > marc_pinsonneault wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not in this one, but it does bring back some memories.
> > > How often is it possible for the free to win when both the Duns
> and
> > > Rhuduar go dark right out of the opening gate? This happened in
> > > 1650/310 and it was over within a very short time. It is one
> thing
> > > for neutrals to decide to join an obviously superior team, but
> quite
> > > another to have turn 1 declarations effectively decide the
> outcome.
> >
> > The neutrals didn't switch on turn 1, but it was fairly early
(turn
> > 3-4). We southern neutrals (I was Harad) dickered around for
> another few
> > turns while AR & CA were overrun. There was a lot (LOT!) of
wailing
> and
> > gnashing of teeth on both sides to try and woo HA and CO. In the
> end, we
> > both went FP, although to no avail. Had we gone FP earlier,
things
> would
> > probably have been much different.
> >
> > jason
>
> No it would not have, you are not that good of a player. The DS
saw
> at most 3000 Harad troops the entire game, how lame.
>
> Brian
And add to the fact you had stated you were going to go DS, and then
backed out because you didn't want to tangle with the Corsairs. Give
me a break, RH and Dunn together do not equal a turn 8 Corsair,
Harad, and Easterling. The DS just outplayed you all. Congrats to
those who were willing to still spend money on the game.
Brian
PS No hard feelings to the Corsairs or Easterlings who had never made
such claims of going DS.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jason Bennett, jasonab@a...
> > E pur si muove!