And now for something completely different: artifacts

[taurnil]

In an effort to wrench discussion away from the subject of player
ratings, I'd like to pose a question about game play.

In 1650 and 2950, where the artifacts are largely the same and the
numbers are known at game start, how would you rate the top 7
artifacts that a team should locate?

If you don't mind, I'd appreciate it if you would identify whether
you are from the US or the UK, as I think there may be some
differences between the two countries' players on this subject. If
you are from neither the US nor the UK, my deepest respects to you -
I'd like to know your thoughts as well.

Best to all,

Mark Jaede

[asendaric_uk]

> Brad Brunet
> from Canada, no more American or British than Angolan

Having just spent 9 weeks in Canada, It seems that canadians are
wanna-be brits ;-)

The pectoral would have to be in my top 6 artifacts, having never had
the luck to wield it, I wouldnt know its power, but i can dream.
As Emi artifacts are a lot more rare in the game, then its
usefullness has got to be higher than a lot of the agent artifacts.

Dave Griffiths

[taurnil]

> XIII
> India currently, before that France, and even before Japan...nope
neither US
> nor UK, sorry sahab.
>

Why, would this be that international man of mystery with whom I have
gamed before?

Best wishes,

Mark

[taurnil]

--- In mepbmlist@y..., "Jeffery A. Dobberpuhl" <webguys@l...> wrote:
> An interesting question, Mark.

Heh.

Jeff, send me an email at taurnil @ Yahoo.com (broken by spaces so
the group displays it). I am now a fellow Minnesotan and not far from
you.

Mark