Ovatha Easterling
2nd February 2008, 12:18 PM
Brad:
Clint already stays up to 2 AM on this PRS, don't add to the manhour
expeditures here.
Rhudaur may not be shown because a certain Canadian occupies eight of the
top ten spots.
Ed
>From: "Brad Brunet" <bbrunec296@...>
>Reply-To: mepbmlist (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com
>To: <mepbmlist (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com>
>Subject: [mepbmlist] PRS Commentary XXVII
>Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 01:07:34 -0500
>
>Apologies for those who are bored of this topic...
>
>How about including, for all ratings:
>
>1) the number of rated players at the top of web page
>2) the mean or median rating value at the top of the web page
>3) number of games used in the rating as a column for all ratings.
>
>#3 is an important one that has been included or taken for granted in most
>other proposed ratings, that I'm aware of. For the Council of the Wise
>it's especially important. It might be worth considering putting all the
>votes together in a table and sorting by "Votes per Game", using Total
>Votes (or similarly sorting the 3 seperate ones this way). This "rating"
>is cumulative, 10 votes in 10 games shouldn't necessarily put me ahead of
>the guy with 9 votes in 4 games.
>
>(these comments would likely be equally valid with any other proposed
>rating system I expect)
>
>And for purely cosmetic and user-friendly reasons, can you add "Next",
>"Previous", and "Up" links instead of simply "Back" (which all browsers
>come with anyway) ?
>
>And hey! I keep checking for my name under Rhudaur but can't find it....
>;-)
>
>Regards,
>
>Brad Brunet
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
Clint already stays up to 2 AM on this PRS, don't add to the manhour
expeditures here.
Rhudaur may not be shown because a certain Canadian occupies eight of the
top ten spots.
Ed
>From: "Brad Brunet" <bbrunec296@...>
>Reply-To: mepbmlist (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com
>To: <mepbmlist (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com>
>Subject: [mepbmlist] PRS Commentary XXVII
>Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 01:07:34 -0500
>
>Apologies for those who are bored of this topic...
>
>How about including, for all ratings:
>
>1) the number of rated players at the top of web page
>2) the mean or median rating value at the top of the web page
>3) number of games used in the rating as a column for all ratings.
>
>#3 is an important one that has been included or taken for granted in most
>other proposed ratings, that I'm aware of. For the Council of the Wise
>it's especially important. It might be worth considering putting all the
>votes together in a table and sorting by "Votes per Game", using Total
>Votes (or similarly sorting the 3 seperate ones this way). This "rating"
>is cumulative, 10 votes in 10 games shouldn't necessarily put me ahead of
>the guy with 9 votes in 4 games.
>
>(these comments would likely be equally valid with any other proposed
>rating system I expect)
>
>And for purely cosmetic and user-friendly reasons, can you add "Next",
>"Previous", and "Up" links instead of simply "Back" (which all browsers
>come with anyway) ?
>
>And hey! I keep checking for my name under Rhudaur but can't find it....
>;-)
>
>Regards,
>
>Brad Brunet
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>