Darrell Shimel
2nd February 2008, 12:19 PM
> In fact, when the PRS discussion was
> ongoing, we had at
> least one person flat-out say they would sabotage
> games and blame it on
> the PRS just out of spite.
That would not be accurate.
What I sad was that I would play in a way that
maximizes my PRS ranking. That is, staying neutral as
long as possible, racking up points, then flipping to
the winning side just before game end.
I'm sorry that you view, "playing for a good score" to
be "sabotage" and "spite".
Perhaps the problem is a PRS which rewards bad play,
and not a player that simply wants to get a very good
score.
Darrell
P.S. Hey Clint, where's my GWC and pin for winning
game 17? I got my pin for 234, and that ended the
same time as 17. Sure, I flipped on the last turn,
but it was a win.
> ongoing, we had at
> least one person flat-out say they would sabotage
> games and blame it on
> the PRS just out of spite.
That would not be accurate.
What I sad was that I would play in a way that
maximizes my PRS ranking. That is, staying neutral as
long as possible, racking up points, then flipping to
the winning side just before game end.
I'm sorry that you view, "playing for a good score" to
be "sabotage" and "spite".
Perhaps the problem is a PRS which rewards bad play,
and not a player that simply wants to get a very good
score.
Darrell
P.S. Hey Clint, where's my GWC and pin for winning
game 17? I got my pin for 234, and that ended the
same time as 17. Sure, I flipped on the last turn,
but it was a win.